For several years I have watched Dr Bergs’ YouTube videos and my opinion is he talks a lot of sense. Currently, the pandemic climate is victim to many hypothesise being flaunted to the public and as a registered nutritionist, I feel ill equipped to try and share another. So I won’t. However, one thing we do know is that a healthy immune system is paramount in all health related matters. And one thing we can all try to do during lockdown is to improve immunity. Something which can have a pretty fast effect on the immunology of the world is food, Including vitamin D (which in the UK we can now also get from the sun as its availability is April-October due to how close we are to the sun). Have a look at dr bergs videos, make up your own mind. Possibly try and improve health at this time when you can cook properly, sleep better, chose wiser foods. If not now, then when?
Critical review of the
foetal origin of disease hypothesis
Louise Usher
David Barker CBE, born 1938, was a physician and epidemiologist.
Prior to his death in August 2013 saw him argue the next generation do
not have to suffer from diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Rather
that the diseases are not mandated by the human genome.As such diseases were not in
existence 100 years ago to the levels of the turn of the millennium, Barker
hypothesised we could prevent them should we have the will to do so.
During Barkers position in 1984 was director of Medical Research Council
Environmental Epidemiology Unit (now renamed MRC Lifecourse epidemiology unit),
he began to observe maps of the UK. Each county in 1910 and 1920 showed
mortality rates of neonatal and post-natal correlated to 60 and 70 years later
a higher death rate from coronary heart disease.
Barker began at this stage to suggest an adverse environment within the
uterus may mean chronic disease later in life. (Hanson., 2015)
2006 saw him awarded a CBE for his work. (Pincock., 2013)
Barkers hypothesis proposed in 1990 that low birth weight, premature
birth and intra uterine growth retardation have a causal relationship to the
origins of non-insulin dependent diabetes, hypertension and coronary heart
disease in middle age.A
historical cohort study saw the hypothesis as it was derived. Significantly, an
association of hypertension and coronary heart disease in middle age and low
birth weight, along with premature birth was ascertained as an association.(Hanson., 2015)
Socio-economic status has a bearing on the support of the hypothesis.Evidence from low income counties
sees low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation highly prevalent and
therefore could not support this study for fear of skewed results.In conjunction, hypertension and
coronary heart disease are less prevalent by a significant number than in
higher income countries. (Barker., 1986)
Barker presents the evidence within his book Fetal and infant Origins of
Adult Disease (1992)
* * * * * * *
Universally
it is known and accepted a malnourished mother will give birth to low
birthweight babies (Hales et al., 2001).As the babies mature into children often they are further undernourished
(Rayhan and Khan., 2006).
The
cycle of poor nutrition leads to cognitive and health issues. Hence maternal
malnutrition needs to be prevented (Paneth and Susser., 1995).
The
prevalence of adult onset hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus have been
linked to a slow rate of growth in years 2-3 of childhood (Rosenbloom et al.,
1999).
Seemingly
there is much evidence to support Barker in his hypothesis.However, he does not explore further into the
possible other causes, for example, should a mother carry a bigger baby due to gestational
diabetes, could this be a preventative for the future of the child? Possibilities
are endless yet not explored currently under the hypothesis. What might make
the fetus a larger born child that might have a preventative effect on the
later life of the adult?Of course, the
reverse may be true. Would something to cause a lower birth weight baby cause
them to be more prone to chronic disease later in life?
The Thrifty phenotype hypothesis
Hales
and Barker studied the associations of increased risk of impaired glucose
tolerance and the metabolic syndrome in 2001 in the Thrifty phenotype
hypothesis.
Epidemiological
findings are concurrent across ethnic group and populations (Hales and Barker.,
2001).Validity of these findings is
therefore widely accepted as a general rule.Debating the extent of the underlying causes posed the question of the
mechanisms of causal agents.Was this
genetic or environmental?
Rarely,
genetic causes of insulin secretion are found in association with poor fetal
growth yet as insulin is a major fetal growth hormone this is a difficult
position to prove.While changes in
glucose metabolism may be linked to genetic polymorphisms yet this will be less
conclusive than the association with lower birth weights.Every human characteristic may possibly be
suggesting within Hales and Barkers paper that type 2 diabetes mellitus resides
within a mix of both genetic and environmental.Leaving the question if a genetically disposed fetus might overcome the
risk factors slightly should the environmental situation be more favorable.
This
hypothesis proposes that indeed environmental factors are a dominant cause of
type 2 diabetes mellitus.Other
influences have a part to play of course.Maternal and placental factors may lead to poor fetal nutrition
(Muthayya,
S., 2009) which gives rise to the under development of pancreatic beta cell
mass (Garofano et al., 1998).The islets
of Langerhans vasculature may be compromised in these fetus’ according to
Nielsen et al (1999), which will contribute as a key element to later life type
2 diabetes mellitus.
Should
an individual continue to be poorly nourished as they grow, therefore remaining
thin, the insulin secretion functional capability and capacity would not be a detrimental
factor.
Typically,
within these findings, Barker and Hales concluded that fetal malnutrition led
to insulin resistance.
Glucose
intolerance would be triggered by obesity.Calories imbalanced as the individual had a lower calorie expenditure,
higher calorie intake and therefore gained weight.Genes were accepted within this paper to play
a part in type 2 diabetes mellitus development yet was encouraged to consider
fetal growth and development.
Below,
figure 1 shows 64-year-old men given a ratio for risk of development of
impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes.Figure 2 shows metabolic syndrome. However, an age is not stated so the
tables are difficult to compare with the differing types of diagnoses.
Figure
3 gives a clear indication of the pathway Hales and Barker were considering for
the development of the metabolic syndrome within the Thrifty phenotype.
Conclusions
stated within this paper ascertained the genetic versus environmental factors
were conclusive towards determining growth and development of type 2 diabetes
mellitus and metabolic syndrome.Within
the conclusion Hales and Barker mention the use of identical twins with the
respect to conclusively showing the importance of fetal environment.However, this does not state in what way.
Could future work lead a study considering twins of equal nutritional status in
utero and yet contrasting environment to discover the development of type 2
diabetes or metabolic syndrome in later life? Hales and Barker finalized with a
statement that this is a stage to consider their finding as a useful framework
for further study.
Syndrome X
1993
saw Barker et al conducting studies to question the prevalence of syndrome x in
lower birthweight babies, shown in table 2. Syndrome X being the development of
Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.The 407 British men from Hertfordshire were
born between 1920 and 1930.
Later
on, studies were performed to test the theory of correlation between lower birth
weight and the incidence of Syndrome X. In the town of Preston, UK, health
visitors recorded the weight of the males babies mentioned above. Between birth
and one year old, details of weights were accurately kept. As 64-year-old men,
revisited, these subjects who were of a birth weight of 6.5lbs or less showed a
significant 22% had been diagnosed with syndrome X.Subjects with birthweights of more than
9.5lbs showed a ten times lower risk factor.
The
second study also carried out in Preston was both sexes. Between 1935 and 1943
(including the war years which may have a bearing on nutritional status of the
mothers), (Winter, JM, 1983). 266 subjects were also measured and the results
comparable of the original findings of Barker and Hales, (1993).
Confounding
variables such as smoking, alcohol consumption and socio-economic status was an
independent factor.
Those
diagnosed later in life with syndrome x had small head circumferences noted and
eruption of teeth was later as seen in table 1. Barker and Hales stated confidentially
that syndrome x and type 2 diabetes have originated from the less favorable
conditions in utero.
Interestingly,
hypertension in adults rose by a mean of 15mmHg in systolic pressure as placental
weight read less than 1lb as measured in table 3. Those with greater placental
weight of 1.5lb saw a fall by 11mmHg of mean systolic pressure.
Highest
blood pressures were recorded in small babies who were born alongside a larger
placenta. The adaptation of circulation may contribute to this finding.Barker and Hales (1993), state that
hypertension may be dependent on improving health and nutrition of
mothers.However, with little evidence
except the facts of measuring and assessing later in life this seems a broad
statement of a fact.
Could those children catch up?
Pampanini
et al, (2017) very recently carried a study on pregnant rats. Assessing of
intrauterine growth restriction (day 19 of gestation) would affect the
developments of the gonads in the fetal rats.Uterine artery ligation was performed on the postnatal rat testis.
Several offspring were killed at day 5, 20 and 40 after birth.At this time, one gonad was preserved within
liquid nitrogen, processed for RNA and steroid extraction. The other, formalin
fixed for histology.
Hormones
testosterone, serum gonadotrophins and estradiol were measured.The control group had shown the growth
restricted rats had 30 genes dysregulated.
By
40 days post partum, the weights of the testis were beginning to catch up in comparison
to those at days 5 and 20.
Harper
et al (2015), explored the effect of food restriction in mice during early
pregnancy. The mice were subject to a 50% restriction of calorie intake from
day 1.5 to 11.5 of pregnancy. While placental weights were reduced, little
effect continued into adulthood.Liver
gene expression and reduction in adipose tissue (in males only) was demonstrated.Irreversible effects on the placenta into
adulthood was doubted. By day 18 global gene expression was non-remarkable compared
to the control group. This study saw the conclusion that alterations in the
placenta caused by restricting nutrients (it remains unclear which nutrients)
early on within pregnancy may in fact be reversible.
Bonel
et al (2010), blindly tested the apparent diffusion co-efficient (ADC) of the
placenta in the paper Diffusion-weighted MR imaging
of the placenta in fetuses with placental insufficiency. If
the fetus birthweight was predicted to be in the 10th percentile or
less, placental insufficiency was diagnosed.Interestingly, when a Doppler of the umbilical artery was performed,
abnormal findings were recorded.Conclusion of the results showed an accuracy of 99% that placental dysfunction
associated with growth restriction is associated with restricted diffusion and
reduced ADC.Early markers used ADC as
an indication of pregnancy complications such as intra uterine growth
retardation.Yet still, no causal factor
was examined as to the placental dysfunction.
Barker
stated in his research Fetal Origins of coronary heart disease (CHD), (1995),
active research needed to continue.Blood pressure, insulin response to glucose, cholesterol metabolism,
blood coagulation and hormonal setting are beginning to show something within
the underlying causal factors relating back to fetal undernutrition.What specific type of nutrition, we do not
know.Also is this purely due to
calorific restrictions of more specific to nutrition intake and possibly bio
availability from mother to fetus? During mid to late gestation, fetal growth
seems to go some way to programming CHD later in life. Once again, placental
size comes into discussion within this paper.Relation of birth size to placenta affects the outcome of later
diseases.Yet within this paper, quality
of placenta is not assessed
Toxic exposures?
Rogers,
(2006) reviewed Barkers Hypothesis more recently in 2006. While this paper is
now dated, at the time Rogers stated new discoveries were suggestive of the
ability of toxic exposures to also impact fetal development. Post-natal and
during the intrauterine period, metabolic programming may be affected due to
sensitivity to endogenous and exogenous influences. Animal studies he looked at
showed low protein and high fat and high carbohydrate diets linked to adverse
metabolic profiles.
Later
still, Thomas (2012), began to look deeper into Barkers hypothesis as he
subjected individuals to an activity questionnaire.Those with a greater activity level showed a
lower propensity for type 2 diabetes. This gives questionability to wondering
if there could be a reversal of type 2 diabetes and perhaps other chronic
diseases which may have been prevalent in this cohort yet with prior knowledge
and adjustment to lifestyle, could this effect be reversed and prevented from
development.
Dutch famine
During
the Dutch famine (Roseboom,. 2006) in 1944-1945 some mothers were limited to a
low calorific diet of 400-1000 kcal/day.Within the mothers who were pregnant and their fetus’ endured famine
early on in its development were born with an atherogenic lipid profile and
higher body mass index.
Those
who were mid to late pregnancy while enduring the famine were more likely to be
impaired with relation to reduced glucose tolerance.
What
causes such differences? This is something we currently do not know.
However,
it is proven (Ong and Loos, 2006.,) rapid weight gain should not be promoted in
small birth weight babies as this can have a central obesity and insulin
resistant effect on health over time (Ibanez et al, 2006). Ibanez et al state
the importance of understanding the underlying predisposition of adversity
could aid preventative interventions.
Is this evidence conclusive?
Many
scientific papers have looked at many numbers of people and aiming to prove or
disprove Barkers hypothesis.Yet most
seem to draw a similar conclusion.Fetal
development and low birth weights seems to link to a higher prevalence of cardiovascular
disease, hypertension, diabetes type 2 (non-insulin dependent), hyperinsulinemia
and hyperlipidemia.With even stronger
evidence showing large placenta linked to low birth weight may be more
suggestive.
Body
composition has not been broken down within the newborn babies to ascertain if
there may be an influential factor within the make-up of the body at this early
stage. Could adipose tissue perhaps be a higher percentage within malnourished
fetal growth? If so, might this give a casual factor to type 2 diabetes
mellitus, CHD and hypertension? Current studies show these chronic diseases contribute
to atherosclerosis, (Luehmann et al., 2017) leading to a further prevalence of
disease and fatality.Could body
composition be influenced by maternal diet in the fetus and early child?Studies might be conducted with a simple test
of when a child holds its head up, suggesting early development of muscular
system, (Bri and Sabatier, 1986.)Watching these children into later life may be another opportunity for
further work.Many studies leading this
research forward is of the utmost importance as Barker began to scratch the
surface of something revealing. Most studies in relation to this have agreed
with the hypothesis of development of chronic disease linked to lower birth
weight babies.However passionate Barker
appeared in relation to this research, was he perhaps also bias? Hoping to find
something deeper than he already had discovered does give way to a bias
although with many other respected scientists confirming Barkers hypothesis
goes some way to realising his claims.
Most
of Barkers early evidence was correlational.Potential confounders were not addressed.Smoking cessation, alcohol, mothers
nutritional status all were not adjusted for.How the baby was fed from birth was not considered as a factor while
evidence shows (Bonel et al, 2010.) the benefits of breastfeeding over other
means. During breastfeeding, should the mother be exposed to toxins, eat well, sleep
well and keep stress low?Any of these
factors may contribute to the child and their body composition as well as
nutritional status.
What
are the latent effects of such a hypothesis? How would the mother benefit from
being forced to eat a healthy diet while pregnant, would she comply, and would
she suffer psychological stress which may be passed on to the baby? (Lsarais et
al, 2006).
To conclude
Li
et al, (2017) have begun to go further into Barkers Hypothesis recently. Questioning
the chances of other factors becoming influential within this study.
We
know that a developing female embryo will begin to lay down the foundations for
her own daughter within the ovaries as she starts very early in the embryonic
stages (Laraia et al, 2006.)Therefore,
it could be suggested that the maternal mother in pregnancy may not only affect
her daughters health but that of a future grandchild.
Changes
in current food culture needs inspiration for change. Health at a population
level must become a priority as we head into the future as disease must turn
into a lower incidence.
As
a species, the health of our nation is currently being compromised worldwide.The effects of what todays expectant mother
subjects her baby to during pregnancy can quite clearly be seen to have an
impact on their long term health. Carrying a daughter will mean many years of
damage will be done which seemingly is very hard to undo. Over such a long period
of time, the nation will become sicker which puts a financial pressure on the economy
as we aim to try and fix these diseases and keep the public healthful.
Barker
clearly highlighted an amazing and conclusive subject. Yet without further work
and of course education to the mothers for them to see the levels of which they
are able to influence the future of the health of the nation, the chances of
change are very limited. While this
sounds bleak, developed countries are becoming more aware of choices of
lifestyle affecting them in their day to day lives.
www.singit.info
Bibliography
Hanson,
M., 2015. The birth and future health of DOHaD. Journal of developmental origins of health and
disease, 6(5), pp.434-437.
Pincock,
S., 2013. David Barker. The
Lancet, 382(9899), p.1170.
Barker,
D.J. and Osmond, C., 1986. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic
heart disease in England and Wales. The Lancet, 327(8489), pp.1077-1081.
Hales,
C.N. and Barker, D.J., 2001. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. British medical bulletin, 60(1).
Rayhan,
M.I. and Khan, M.S.H., 2006. Factors causing malnutrition among under five
children in Bangladesh. Pak
J Nutr, 5(6), pp.558-562.
Paneth,
N. and Susser, M., 1995. Early origin of coronary heart disease (the"
Barker hypothesis"). BMJ:
British Medical Journal, 310(6977), p.411.
Rosenbloom,
A.L., Joe, J.R., Young, R.S. and Winter, W.E., 1999. Emerging epidemic of type
2 diabetes in youth. Diabetes
care, 22(2), pp.345-354.
Poulter,
N.R., 2001. Birthweights, maternal cardiovascular events, and Barker
hypothesis. The Lancet, 357(9273), pp.1990-1991.
Barker,
D.J., Hales, C.N., Fall, C.H.D., Osmond, C., Phipps, K. and Clark, P.M.S.,
1993. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and
hyperlipidaemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth. Diabetologia, 36(1), pp.62-67.
Chait,
A. and Brunzell, J.D., 1990. Acquired hyperlipidemia (secondary dyslipoproteinemias). Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North
America, 19(2), pp.259-278.
Pampanini,
V., Germani, D., Puglianiello, A., Stukenborg, J.B., Reda, A., Savchuk, I.,
Kjartansdóttir, K.R., Cianfarani, S. and Söder, O., 2017. Impact of uteroplacental
insufficiency on postnatal rat male gonad. Journal of Endocrinology, 232(2), pp.247-257.
Harper,
J.L., Caesar, G.A., Pennington, K.A., Davis, J.W. and Schulz, L.C., 2015.
Placental changes caused by food restriction during early pregnancy in mice are
reversible. Reproduction, 150(3), pp.165-172.
Roseboom,
T., de Rooij, S. and Painter, R., 2006. The Dutch famine and its long-term
consequences for adult health.Early human development,82(8), pp.485-491.
Ferrannini,
E., Haffner, S.M., Mitchell, B.D. and Stern, M.P., 1991. Hyperinsulinaemia: the
key feature of a cardiovascular and metabolic syndrome. Diabetologia, 34(6), pp.416-422.
Barker,
D.J., 1995. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(6998), p.171.
Rogers,
J.M., 2006. The Barker hypothesis: implications for future directions in
toxicology research. Current
Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, 13(6), pp.536-540.
Thomas,
N., 2012. Beyond the Barker hypothesis and the thrifty genotype-The womb,
ethnicity, genes and the environment-Recent perspectives on the evolution of
diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in India. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 16(Suppl 2), p.S142.
Li,
X., Zhang, M., Pan, X., Xu, Z. and Sun, M., 2017. “Three Hits” Hypothesis for
Developmental Origins of Health and Diseases in View of Cardiovascular
Abnormalities. Birth
Defects Research.
Laraia,
B.A., Siega-Riz, A.M., Gundersen, C. and Dole, N., 2006. Psychosocial factors
and socioeconomic indicators are associated with household food insecurity
among pregnant women. The
Journal of nutrition, 136(1), pp.177-182.
Luehmann,
H., Detering, L., Gropler, R.J. and Liu, Y., 2017. CC Chemokine Receptor Type 2
(CCR2) Targeted PET Imaging of Early Atherosclerosis.
Muthayya,
S., 2009. Maternal nutrition & low birth weight-what is really
important. Indian J Med Res, 130(5), pp.600-8.
Garofano,
A., Czernichow, P. and Breant, B., 1998. Beta-cell mass and proliferation
following late fetal and early postnatal malnutrition in the rat. Diabetologia, 41(9), pp.1114-1120.
Nielsen,
J.H., Svensson, C., Galsgaard, E.D., Møldrup, A. and Billestrup, N., 1999. Beta
cell proliferation and growth factors. Journal of molecular medicine, 77(1), pp.62-66.
Winter,
J.M., 1983. Unemployment, nutrition and infant mortality in Britain 1920–1950.
In Influence of Economic
Instability on Health (pp. 169-199). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Bonel,
H.M., Stolz, B., Diedrichsen, L., Frei, K., Saar, B., Tutschek, B., Raio, L.,
Surbek, D., Srivastav, S., Nelle, M. and Slotboom, J., 2010. Diffusion-weighted
MR imaging of the placenta in fetuses with placental insufficiency. Radiology, 257(3), pp.810-819.
Ong,
K.K. and Loos, R.J., 2006. Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity:
systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions.Acta Paediatrica,95(8), pp.904-908.
Ibáñez,
L., Ong, K., Dunger, D.B. and de Zegher, F., 2006. Early development of
adiposity and insulin resistance after catch-up weight gain in small-for-gestational-age
children.The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &
Metabolism,91(6), pp.2153-2158.
Bril,
B. and Sabatier, C., 1986. The cultural context of motor development: Postural
manipulations in the daily life of Bambara babies (Mali).International Journal of Behavioral Development,9(4),
pp.439-453.
With yesterday as World digestive health day , this is a great time to talk about gut health and the impact it can have within many areas of our biology. My research has taught me more about the importance of probiotics than I already knew. Microbiota is the name given to the microbe population living in our intestine. Making up 90% of our cells! Containing 100s of trillions of microorganisms including at least 5000 different species of bacteria. The microbiota are important in nutrition, immunity and the brain. The Microbiome is the combined genetic microorganisms in a particular environment. Millions of years of co-evolution have moulded this human microorganism interaction into a symbiotic relationship where the gut bacteria contribute essentially to human nutrient metabolism and in return occupy a nutrient rich environment. Children born vaginally get much needed microbes as they pass through the vaginal canal from the mother. Yet those who are born by cesarian section tend to suffer more with asthma, allergies and leukaemia, (Neu, 2011.) Breast fed children have an intake of sugars containing sialic acid which promotes infant growth through healthy microbiome, (Nestle Nutrition Insitiute), due to feeding the microbes. Seratoin production is thought to be produced to the massive quantities of 90% within the gut, (Yano et al., 2015) which gives evidence to show those with altered microbiome will suffer further with depression and mental health issues, (Evrensel and Ceylan, 2015). A major role is played by the gut microbiome in bidirectional communication between the gut and brain. The Brain - gut axis communicates its systems between the Central Nervous System and Gastero Intestinal Tract, (Burokas, 2015.) As Burokas published in Science Direct, the gut microbiota can be a key regulator of mood, cognition, pain and obesity. The immune cells are stimulated by a population of microbiota. Those with impaired microbiome shows dendritic cells are reduced in the ability to stimulate pro inflammatory T cell responses. Short chain fatty acids (SCFA) are produced in the gut and this aids the body immune systems and metabolic functions. When dietary fibre is fermented in the colon, short chain fatty acids are produced. They have many physiological roles in body functions. Butyrate is important for colon health and is a SCFA which arises from the bacterial fermentation of dietary fibre. Produced by the probiotics, Butyrate is an important food for the cells lining the colon (colonocytes). Increasing the energy production and cell proliferation, there may be a protective element against colon cancer. The colonic inflammatory response if mediated by the presence of Butyrate. 70% of the energy needed for colonocytes is provided by this SCFA. It is beleived there is a preventative and therapeutic potential to counteract inflammation mediated ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer by the increase of modulation of the immune response and inhibiting tumour genesis. Non starch polysaccharides feed the microbiome. Contributing to the host digestion (us).
Polyphenols are phytochemical fund in vegetables, legumes, chocolate, cranberries and green tea. The consumption of these carries a reduced risk of chronic disease. The low absorption rate in the upper gasteroinstestinal tract will benefit the colon. Once the microflora break them down, they may change into bacteria themselves and possibly play a prebiotic role to modify the microbiota favourably.
Wu et al, (2011) studied the long term diet and the association with the microbiome. Gut health is important. As 70% of the immune system is in the gut, we need to know the factors affecting the microbiome.
The largest affect is the host species, body mass, age, lifestyle and smoking.
Medium affecters: Antibiotic use
Medium-small: Drugs, exercise, genetics, pet co-habitation.
Small affect: Short term dietary intervention. Can a daily supplement help? I would say the best bet is to take one, while the stomach acid is quiet (IE not before or after food but about 2 hours either side) and definitely without adding any hot drinks. Heat will kill the important bacteria within the supplement. Try it, you might be surprised how amazing you feel.
1941 saw the exposure of solar exposure and cancer risk. Later studies found associations with low vitamin D levels associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune issues such as inflammatory bowel disease, MS and animal studies supported low vitamin D causing increased inflammation and cancer.
Adequate levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin d (OHD25) is considered a level of about 50nmol/L at the end of winter and 10-20nmol/L higher at the end of summer. The institute of medicine vs the endocrine society state the guidelines inappropriately conclude the benefits of vitamin d are at 75nmol/L 25OHD and above. Mistakenly concluding all persons with serum 25OHDlevels below 50nmol/L are deficient.
UK DoH recommends a plasma concentration of 25nmol/L
In 2016 public health england published a report advising that 10 micrograms are advised daily to support bones, teeth and muscle. This advice was published in line with recommendations from SACN to suggest this safe level for everyone over 4 years old. SACN did not take into account the vitamin D from sun exposure as the synthesis of the vitamin through the skin is complex. PHE advises that throughout the months from March until October the majority of the public gain enough vitamin D through sunlight and a balanced diet. During the winter, dietary sources are relied on. IT is difficult for people to meet the 10 microgram recommendation. Fortification of foods will assist with those who are less likely to get out in sunlight and those who do not consume enough naturally through diet.
Deficiency - corresponds with blood levels with clinical evidence of bone disease such as rickets or osteomalacia. Once levels are below 20-25nmol/L a very high risk is present.
Insufficiency is a biochemical term. No clinical evidence of disease is present. PTH levels may be elevated in the blood.
Some studies do not differentiate yet the differentiation will really determine a change of numbers reported on the studies.
A large number of studies exist to show low 25OHD is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cancer, autoimmune disease and increased mortality.
Is vitamin D simply a good marker for health? Were the randomised control trials started early enough? Were these studies including looking at calcium?
Vitamin D toxicity is rare but potentially serious.
HypervitaminosisD is not caused by diet or sum exposure but rather intake of a supplement at levels of 60,000 IU a day for several months. As the body regulates the vitamin D produced from sun absorption really very well, fortification may be an excellent answer to gain better status levels from the diet. Fortified foods do not contain major amounts of vitamin D and are regulated closely.
Toxicity from vitamin D has a main consequence of hypercalcemia in the blood. Symptoms noted are nausea, increased urination and weakness. Possible progression pathways are into bone pain, kidney problems and the formation of calcium stones. Treatment includes stopping vitamin D intake and restricting calcium in the diet.
Naturally occurring vitamin D can be found in fatty fish and fish liver oils. A plant source of vitamin d is mushrooms although this is vitamin d2 yet animal products contain vitamin d3.
The largest source of dietary vitamin d is fortified foods. Namely milk, orange juice and cereals.
Vitamin D is essential to bone metabolism and calcium absorption.
Vitamin D deficiency is common among older adults as they have impaired ability to synthesise vitamin d from the sun
My magazine column will see me post a recipe of simple cake prior to Easter.
I need images!
Do you have any nice photos of your simnel cake you would allow me to use for my publication? You will get the credit and retain the copyright. Please send them to my email lusherlifenutrition@gmail.com
You see, this year I have simply run out of time to bake and take a photo of a simnel cake. I would love your help!
